Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 1809 of 1809

contour labeling that is somewhat view dependent, this goes for Label Terrain Contour tool as well

contour labels that are upside down our difficult to read. It would be advantageous to have all labels orientated correctly on each sheet (regardless of the north direction).
over 3 years ago in OpenRoads Designer 0 Future consideration

Additional Measure and Draw tools for Dynamic Sections

I would like a set of tools that I can measure and draw slopes with in the dynamic sections. I can use temporary dimensions for the active corridor elements only, but I would like to get the slopes of elements in adjacent corridors that are in my ...
about 1 year ago in Modeling / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer 1 Future consideration

Rm Bridge: Use local axis for leading envelope displacements when local axis results are being reported

When reporting envelope .sup files, the leading value when reporting displacements is always global, while the results displayed are either local or gobal (selected by the user). This is inconvenient for displacement envelope result reporting when...
11 months ago in OpenBridge Designer 0 Future consideration

Plan Annotation by station range

It would be useful to have the ability to annotate only part of the horizontal alignment. There are situations where we need to have several different annotation groups along the alignment.
about 3 years ago in Annotation / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 1 Future consideration

Civil Labeler - Defined Rotation Angle

We place grade elevation labels on our plans typically at a 30 degree angle from the view. Currently, the civil labeler only allows for rotation to be set to "View Horizontal" or "View Vertical" regarding placement as it relates to the active view...
almost 3 years ago in Annotation / Drawing Production / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 1 Future consideration

Challenges when different template components/features share the same name but with different assigned feature definitions

Suppose you have a corridor with two different template drops. The first template has a component called "pavement_left" with a feature definition "pvmt_ friction _course". The second template has a component also called "pavement_left" with a fea...
almost 3 years ago in Modeling / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 1 Future consideration

Send to Back

Add a “Send to Back” feature for vector linework (what order you see and print levels in). Currently there is a "Bring to Front" option. AUTOCAD has this feature and I think it would be very helpful to not only me. Thank you.
4 months ago in OpenRoads Designer 1 Needs review

Vertically Aligned Collision Free Cross Section Frame Annotation when Using Horizontal Text

Using OpenRail 2024 Vertical Frame Text significantly increases the height of Cross Sections, THUS causing more sheets. Would like the capability to have Horizontal Text in a frame, one row for Offset, one for Elevation. While this can be done, wh...
4 months ago in Annotation / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer 0 Future consideration

Need to add functionality to LBS for struts/web walls between pier columns.

Currently, if an OBM model is defined with a strut/web wall between pier columns, the strut will not transfer to LBS, and there is no way within the LBS substructure design module to add a strut/web wall. This is a hug problem because we have brid...
8 months ago in Modeling / OpenBridge Designer / OpenBridge Modeler 0 Planned

Add functionality to LBS to handle round variable column definition and analysis/design

Currently, if a bridge is modeled in OBM using variable columns with a round cross-section, that column cannot be accurately transferred to LBS, nor can a variable-round cross-section be defined, analyzed, or designed within LBS. This is a big hol...
8 months ago in Modeling / OpenBridge Designer / OpenBridge Modeler 0 Future consideration